The time frame for applying for Class D medical device registration under MDACS (Medical Device Administrative Control System) in Hong Kong varies depending on the completeness of the submission, device complexity, and the responsiveness of the applicant/LRP during the review. Since Class D devices are high-risk (e.g., implantables, life-supporting devices, high-sensitivity IVDs), the review process is more rigorous than lower classes.
Below is a detailed explanation of the typical registration timeline and the review process phases for Class D medical devices in Hong Kong.
| Stage | Duration (Estimated) |
|---|---|
| Pre-submission preparation | 1–3 months (depending on readiness) |
| Application submission | 1 week (document upload via MDIS portal) |
| Initial screening by MDD | 2–4 weeks |
| Technical assessment | 3–6 months (may extend to 9 months for complex devices) |
| Request for clarification / response | Additional 2–8 weeks per round |
| Final approval and listing | 1–2 weeks after all issues are resolved |
✅ Average total timeline: 4 to 9 months
❗ For novel or incomplete applications, 10–12 months is possible.
| Factor | Impact |
|---|---|
| Completeness of technical documentation | Delays if missing/misaligned |
| Foreign approvals (CE/FDA) status | Accelerates if clear and valid |
| Quality of risk management and clinical data | Affects depth of review |
| Manufacturer's QMS (ISO 13485) scope | Must be valid and device-specific |
| Responsiveness to MDD inquiries | Faster if replies are timely |
| LRP experience with MDACS | Skilled LRP shortens delays |
MDD checks if:
LRP is correctly appointed
All forms are complete and signed
Required documents are uploaded in MDIS
File format and language requirements are met
✅ Outcome:
Accept for detailed review
Or return for resubmission if incomplete
MDD reviews compliance with:
Essential Principles of Safety and Performance
Quality Management System (ISO 13485 certificate)
Foreign market authorization (e.g., CE, FDA, TGA)
Test reports: biocompatibility, electrical, EMC, software validation
Clinical evaluation report (if required)
Risk management (ISO 14971 framework)
Labeling and Instructions for Use (IFU) per GN-07
✅ Outcome:
Proceed to next phase if compliant
Or issue Request for Clarification (RFC) for deficiencies
Applicant/LRP is asked to:
Provide missing or updated documents
Clarify test results, labeling content, intended use
Address gaps in risk or clinical evaluation
⏱ MDD typically allows 10–30 calendar days to respond per RFC.
✅ Tip: Timely, accurate responses reduce the number of review cycles.
If all documents are satisfactory:
MDD issues Letter of Acceptance
Device is listed on the MDACS website
A Listing Number (MDxxxxxx) is assigned
LRP receives official notification
✅ Device may now be marketed, distributed, and used in Hong Kong.
| Activity | Time Estimate |
|---|---|
| Pre-application prep | 1–3 months |
| MDACS submission & admin check | 2–4 weeks |
| Technical review | 3–6 months |
| Clarification responses | 1–2 months (varies) |
| Final approval & listing | 1–2 weeks |
No fixed statutory deadline: Since MDACS is a voluntary system, the Department of Health has no legally mandated timeline for review.
High-quality technical files may receive faster approval.
Class D reviews are prioritized if related to public tenders or hospital applications (based on MDD discretion).
MDACS registration is valid for 5 years; renewal should start at least 6 months before expiration.
| Recommendation | Why It Helps |
|---|---|
| Submit a complete, well-organized dossier | Reduces back-and-forth |
| Include valid CE/FDA approval documents | Adds credibility and speeds review |
| Respond to MDD queries within 10 days | Keeps review process moving |
| Use an experienced LRP | Ensures accurate MDIS submissions |
| Translate labeling into Traditional Chinese | Minimizes labeling objections |
| Pre-review your risk & clinical files | Prevents rejection or delay |
.jpg)
Whatsapp or Wechat:+86 15816864648;email address:hito.lin@grzan.cn